|
| Candidate | Brief Response | Full Response |
|---|
| Conley, Doug |
Maybe |
Need more information. |
| Galindo, Cam |
Yes |
Yes. Over the years, Hamilton has learned that one way streets simply are not affective. We can learn a lot from other municipalities that focus on two-way streets that support pedestrian and cycling traffic. |
| Marrone, Tone |
No |
i'm not in favor of turning obe way streets into two way streets.it 's bad for the enviroment as well as time travel.Hamiltons traffic flow was never a problem,as a matter of fact,our streets worked extremely efficiently before,they don`t anymore.
|
| McMullen, Geraldine |
Yes |
Yes, I support complete streets and I believe that two-way streets make it safer for pedestrians and cyclists. It will also make transit connection to transit more accessible and convenient for riders.
|
| Robbins, Marie |
Yes |
Yes I do. One-way streets are an important part of our roadway management system and if we are going to get serious about traffic management we should be keeping all options on the table. However, there are a number of one-ways that are ill suited to the function of the street that could stand to be converted to two-ways. The conversion of James St. North to two-ways, and the neighborhood’s subsequent revitalization, is a clear demonstration that not all streets are successful as one ways.
|
| Rosser, Christopher |
No |
I do not support converting more of Hamilton's one-way thoroughfares. I do however feel the one way street system can adapt to support walking, cycling and transit.
|
| Rukavina, Frank |
Maybe |
I would be interested in studying the opinions of the BIA's in the effected areas. I would not be in favour of change King street nor Main Street. |
