Elections
Do you support phasing out area rating for transit? Why or why not?
Responses to the question: "Do you support phasing out area rating for transit? Why or why not?"
In This Page:
1 Candidate Response (top)
Ward 15 | ||
---|---|---|
Candidate | Brief Response | Full Response |
McKechnie, Susan | Maybe | Area Rating related to transit has to be considered in light of the majestic geography that makes up Hamilton. Over 1,100 square kilometres defines us and most of this area is sparsely populated and will remain out of the reach of conventional public transit solutions.
Public Transit in its current form is simply something that can’t be made economically available to the overwhelming majority of the geography of Hamilton. It deserves special consideration. This is not to suggest that the future leadership should do nothing. Transit solutions must be delivered. There must be an aim to deliver sensible transit services to key hubs across all wards in the city. There should be cost sharing as part of an overall strategy that brings the topic of transit into the conversation about tax equity across the city, for all residents. The facts are simple – Public transit routes will not be available to over 70% of the vast geography of the city. Unique rules will need to apply here. Today there is no transit option for young people or seniors to get from Carlisle, or Rockton, or Lynden, or Binbrook, or Waterdown etc. to McMaster or Mohawk for their studies, to the downtown area for their medical or hospital appointments. This needs to change. |
Response Summary (top)
Brief Response | Count | % of Total |
---|---|---|
Yes | 0 | 0.0% |
No | 0 | 0.0% |
Maybe | 1 | 100.0% |
1 Candidate Has Not Responded (top)
Ward 15 | ||
---|---|---|
Partridge, Judi |