Elections
Hamilton has a legacy of multi-lane, one-way arterial streets dating back to the 1950s. Do you support accelerating the conversion of these streets to two-way? Why or why not?
Responses to the question: "Hamilton has a legacy of multi-lane, one-way arterial streets dating back to the 1950s. Do you support accelerating the conversion of these streets to two-way? Why or why not?"
In This Page:
6 Candidate Responses (top)
| Ward 03 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Candidate | Brief Response | Full Response |
| Bureau, Alain | Yes | |
| Farr, Laura | Yes | I have always and continue to support the conversions. The reasons for making the streets one way - many people going to and from the factory jobs in the east end - are no longer where people are going to and from anymore. |
| Kuruc, Ned | Maybe | I support the conversion to two-lane streets, as long as it fits into Hamilton's master transit plan. |
| Nann, Nrinder | Yes | Yes. There are more than 80 one-way streets in the city. Conversions to two-way streets will calm traffic, reduce side-street cut-throughs, and help us move towards complete streets, where streets are accessible to all users and safe for pedestrians.
Plus, the conversion to two-way streets has been part of a long-delayed update to the 2007 transportation master plan. It's time we implement the plan we created more than a decade ago. |
| Smith, Dan | Yes | I think conversion to two way would help as it tends to slow traffic a bit. Speed is a main reason why accidents happen. |
| Sprague, Kristeen | No | I think we need to consider improving the road surfaces before we consider converting more streets to two-way streets. |
Response Summary (top)
| Brief Response | Count | % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | 4 | 66.7% |
| No | 1 | 16.7% |
| Maybe | 1 | 16.7% |
7 Candidates Have Not Responded (top)
| Ward 03 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Balta, Milena | ||
| Beck, Keith | ||
| Denault, Steven Paul | ||
| Kavanaugh, Brendan | ||
| Lemma, Tony | ||
| Rowe, Stephen | ||
| Salonen, Amanda | ||
